Ombudsman Office Logo  

Office of the Ombudsman
State of Hawaii

 

Home
Report No. 35
Report No. 34
Report No. 33
Report No. 32
Report No. 31
Index of Summaries

 

REPORT of the OMBUDSMAN

 

For the Period July 1, 2000 - June 30, 2001
Report No. 32

 

Presented to the Legislature
pursuant to Section 96-16 of
the Hawaii Revised Statutes

 December 2001

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

I.  THE YEAR IN BRIEF

            The Office Workload

            Staff Changes

            Outreach Efforts

            United States Ombudsman Association

II.  STATISTICAL TABLES

           1.  Numbers and Types of Inquiries

           2.  Means by Which Inquiries Are Received

           3.  Distribution of Population and Inquirers by Residence

           4.  Distribution of Types of Inquiries by Residence of Inquirers

           5.  Means of Receipt of Inquiries by Residence

           6.  Distribution and Disposition of Jurisdictional Complaints by Agency

           7.  Distribution and Disposition of Substantiated Jurisdictional Complaints by Agency

           8.  Distribution of Information Requests

           9.  Distribution of Non-Jurisdictional Complaints

         10.  Inquiries Carried Over to Fiscal Year 2000-2001 and Their Dispositions, and Inquiries Carried Over to Fiscal Year 2001-2002

III.  SELECTED CASE SUMMARIES

 

 

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

   

Mr. President, Mr. Speaker, and Members of the
        Hawaii State Legislature of 2001:

            In accordance with Section 96-16, Hawaii Revised Statutes, I am pleased to submit the report of the Office of the Ombudsman for fiscal year 2000-2001.  This is the thirty-second annual report since the establishment of the office in 1969.

            During the past year, we have increased our efforts to improve the public’s awareness of the Office of the Ombudsman and of our role as a link between the people and their government.  We remain steadfast in our commitment to improve the level of public administration in Hawaii through the independent and impartial investigation of citizen complaints.

            I would like to thank the Governor, the Mayors of the various counties, and the State and County department heads and employees for their ongoing cooperation and assistance in our efforts to resolve citizen complaints and concerns.

            I would also like to convey my personal appreciation to First Assistant Donna Woo and the other professional and support staff members of the Office of the Ombudsman for their continued commitment and dedication to the office and its mission.

                                                            Respectfully submitted,

 

                                                            ROBIN K. MATSUNAGA
                                                            Ombudsman

 

December 2001

return to Table of Contents

 

 

Chapter I

THE YEAR IN BRIEF

 

The Office Workload 

            During fiscal year 2000-2001, the office received a total of 5,880 inquiries.  Of these inquiries 4,134, approximately 70 percent, may be classified as complaints within the jurisdiction of the office.  The remaining inquiries consisted of 1,229 requests for information and 517 non-jurisdictional complaints.

            The 5,880 inquiries received during fiscal year 2000-2001 represent a slight increase from the 5,796 inquiries received the previous fiscal year.  However, the number of complaints in fiscal year 2000-2001 decreased slightly.

            A comparison of inquiries received between the 1999-2000 and 2000-2001 fiscal years is presented in the accompanying table.

TWO-YEAR CASELOAD COMPARISON

Years

Total
Inquiries

Information
Requests

Non-
Jurisdictional
Complaints

Jurisdictional Complaints

Total
Jurisdictional

Prison
Complaints

General
Complaints

1999-2000

5,796

1,054

555

4,187

2,504

1,683

2000-2001

5,880

1,229

517

4,134

2,513

1,621

Numerical
Change

84

175

-38

-53

9

-62

Percentage
Change

1.4%

16.6%

-6.8%

-1.3%

0.4%

-3.7%

return to Table of Contents

 

Staff Changes 

            In December 2000, two new members joined our staff.  Mark Au, former Deputy Corporation Counsel, Family Support Division, City and County of Honolulu, joined our staff as an analyst.  Mr. Au brings with him vast knowledge of the child support enforcement system which has been of great benefit to the office in our handling of complaints against the Child Support Enforcement Agency.  We also welcomed Sheila Alderman to our office.  Before joining us, Ms. Alderman was the receptionist at Central Union Church where she also coordinated and maintained its busy calendar of events.  We extend our warmest welcome to Mr. Au and Ms. Alderman.

            At the close of the fiscal year, our office consisted of Ombudsman Robin Matsunaga, First Assistant Donna Woo, analysts Herbert Almeida, Mark Au, Gillman Chu, Alfred Itamura, Glenn Mirikidani, Lynn Oshiro and David Tomatani, and office staff Sheila Alderman, Edna de la Cruz, Debbie Goya, Sue Oshima and Linda Teruya.

return to Table of Contents

 

 

Outreach Efforts 

            In the past, the most common forms of outreach our office engaged in were quarterly or bimonthly advertisements in various statewide and local newspapers and occasional speaking engagements before various schools and community organizations.  This year, we expanded our outreach efforts to several new areas.  With the assistance of the State Senate computer staff, we created a Web site for the office.  This Web site provides information about the office, our annual report, and links to Hawaii government Web sites and the Web sites of other ombudsman offices and ombudsman organizations.  Our Web address is <www.ombudsman.state.hi.us>.

            We also developed an educational exhibit booth for display at public venues, including local trade shows and exhibitions.  In June 2001, our exhibit booth made its debut at the Annual Home and Garden Show held at the Neal Blaisdell Center.  Over the four days of the show, we handed out hundreds of informational brochures and fielded countless questions about our functions and duties.  We believe that participation in this type of forum will introduce more of the public to the services we offer.

            In addition, in order to increase accessibility to our office, in January 2001 a Text Teletype (TTY) unit was installed to enable communication by telephone with hearing/speech impaired persons.  With this device, we hope to extend our services to those who find difficulty in using conventional means of communication.

return to Table of Contents

 

 

United States Ombudsman Association 

            This office continues to play an active role in the United States Ombudsman Association (USOA).  Ombudsman Robin Matsunaga has been elected to a second two-year term on the USOA Board of Directors, and currently serves as president of the organization.  Under his presidency, Mr. Matsunaga has pledged to advance the purposes of the organization, which are to improve the operation of Ombudsman offices throughout the United States and to promote and encourage the establishment of Ombudsman offices at the international, national, state, and local levels.

return to Table of Contents

 

 

 Chapter II

STATISTICAL TABLES

  

TABLE  1

NUMBERS AND TYPES OF INQUIRIES

Fiscal Year 2000-2001

 Month Total
Inquiries
Jurisdictional
Complaints
Non
Jurisdictional
Complaints
Information
Requests
 July 528 379 42 107
 August 607 407 58 142
 September 532 385 38 109
 October 552 397 45 110
 November 473 324 44 105
 December 390 294 39 57
 January 533 373 37 123
 February 463 308 52 103
 March 507 359 50 98
 April 464 329 36 99
 May 438 309 46 83
 June 393 270 30 93
 TOTAL 5,880 4,134 517 1,229
 % of Total
   Inquiries
100.0% 70.3% 8.8% 20.9%

return to Table of Contents

   

TABLE 2

MEANS BY WHICH INQUIRIES ARE RECEIVED

Fiscal Year 2000-2001

 Month Telephone Mail E-mail Fax Visit Other
 July 495 26 4 1  2 0
 August 578 22 3 0  3 1
 September 509 19 1 1  2 0
 October 512 30 2 1  7 0
 November 428 37 3 1  4 0
 December 366 18 5 0  1 0
 January 487 32 2 0 12 0
 February 425 24 6 0   8 0
 March 453 27 12 2 13 0
 April 435 21 1 1   6 0
 May 405 28 2 1   2 0
 June 355 27 3 4   4 0
 TOTAL 5,448 311 44 12 64 1
 % of Total
   Inquiries (5,880)
92.7% 5.3% 0.7% 0.2% 1.1% 0.0%

return to Table of Contents

  

TABLE 3

DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION AND
INQUIRERS BY RESIDENCE

Fiscal Year 2000-2001

 Residence Population* Percent of
Total
Population
Total
Inquiries
Percent of
Total
Inquiries
 City & County of Honolulu 876,156 72.3% 4,379 74.5%
 County of Hawaii 148,677 12.3% 662 11.3%
 County of Maui 128,241 10.6% 463  7.9%
 County of Kauai  58,463  4.8% 136  2.3%
 Out-of-State --- --- 240  4.1%
 TOTAL 1,211,537 100.0% 5,880 100.0%

*Source:  The State of Hawaii Data Book 2000, A Statistical
 Abstract.  Hawaii State Department of Business,
 Economic Development and Tourism, Table 1.06,
 “Resident Population, by Counties:  1980 to 2000.

 return to Table of Contents

 

TABLE 4

DISTRIBUTION OF TYPES OF INQUIRIES
BY RESIDENCE OF INQUIRERS

Fiscal Year 2000-2001

 Residence TYPES OF INQUIRIES
Jurisdictional Complaints Non-Jurisdictional
Complaints
Information Requests
Number Percent
of Total
Number Percent
of Total
Number Percent
of Total
 C&C of
   Honolulu
3,140 76.0% 339 65.6%  900 73.2%
 County of
   Hawaii
   441 10.7%  68 13.2%  153  12.4%
 County of
   Maui
   321   7.8% 34   6.6%  108   8.8%
 County of
   Kauai
    91   2.2% 12   2.3%    33   2.7%
 Out-of-State    141   3.4% 64 12.4%    35   2.8%
 TOTAL    4,134 100.0% 517 100.0% 1,229 100.0%

return to Table of Contents

  

TABLE 5

 

MEANS OF RECEIPT AND TYPES OF INQUIRIES
BY RESIDENCE

Fiscal Year 2000-2001

 Residence Total
Inquiries
Means of Receipt
Telephone Mail E-mail Fax Visit Other
 C&C of
   Honolulu
4,379 4,114 156 41 4 63 1
 % of C&C
   of Honolulu
100.0%  93.9% 3.6% 0.9% 0.1% 1.4% 0.0%
 County of
   Hawaii
662 628 25 1 8 0 0
 % of County
   of Hawaii
100.0%  94.9% 3.8% 0.2% 1.2% 0.0% 0.0%
 County of
   Maui
463 445 16 1 0 1 0
 % of County
   of Maui
100.0%  96.1% 3.5% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%
 County of
   Kauai
136 128 8 0  0 0 0
 % of County
   of Kauai
100.0% 94.1% 5.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
 Out-of-State 240 133  106 1 0 0 0
 % of Out-
   of-State
100.0% 55.4% 442% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
 TOTAL 5,880 5,448 311 44 12 64 1
 % of TOTAL 100.0% 92.7% 5.3% 0.7% 0.2% 1.1% 0.0%

return to Table of Contents

 

TABLE 6

DISTRIBUTION AND DISPOSITION OF
JURISDICTIONAL COMPLAINTS BY AGENCY

Fiscal Year 2000-2001

 Agency Juris-
dictional
Complaints
Percent
of Total
Completed
Investigations
Discon-
tinued
Declined Assisted Pending
Substan-
tiated
Not
Substan-
tiated
 State Departments
 Accounting &
   General Services
39

0.9% 

7 16 3 5 3 5
 Agriculture 8 0.2% 1 4 1 1 1 0
 Attorney General 456 11.0% 16 26 20 30 359 5
 Budget & Finance 70  1.7% 9 25 6 17 10 3
 Business, Economic
   Devel. & Tourism
40  1.0% 8 20  2 7 2 1
 Commerce &
   Consumer Affairs
34 0.8% 2 12  2 5 5 8
 Defense 4 0.1% 0 1 0 2 0 1
 Education 101